Copper: $9,245/t ▲ +2.1% | Cobalt: $24,800/t ▼ -1.3% | Lithium: $10,200/t ▲ +0.8% | Railway Progress: 67% ▲ +3pp Q4 | Corridor FDI: $14.2B ▲ +28% YoY | Angola GDP: 4.4% ▲ +3.2pp vs 2023 (2024) | DRC GDP: 6.1% ▼ -2.4pp vs 2023 (2024) | Zambia GDP: 3.8% ▼ -1.5pp vs 2023 (2024) | Copper: $9,245/t ▲ +2.1% | Cobalt: $24,800/t ▼ -1.3% | Lithium: $10,200/t ▲ +0.8% | Railway Progress: 67% ▲ +3pp Q4 | Corridor FDI: $14.2B ▲ +28% YoY | Angola GDP: 4.4% ▲ +3.2pp vs 2023 (2024) | DRC GDP: 6.1% ▼ -2.4pp vs 2023 (2024) | Zambia GDP: 3.8% ▼ -1.5pp vs 2023 (2024) |
Glossary

Kimberley Process

By Lobito Corridor Intelligence · Last updated May 19, 2026 · 3 min

The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) is an international agreement established in 2003 to prevent the trade in conflict diamonds. Participating cou

Contents
  1. Definition
  2. Corridor Context
  3. Related Terms

Definition

The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) is an international agreement established in 2003 to prevent the trade in conflict diamonds. Participating countries must certify that diamond exports are conflict-free, with shipments accompanied by Kimberley Process certificates.

Corridor Context

Angola and the DRC are both Kimberley Process participants. Angola's Catoca and Lulo diamond operations are KP-compliant. The DRC's artisanal diamond sector faces greater compliance challenges. The Kimberley Process has been criticised for its narrow definition of conflict diamonds and is undergoing reform discussions to address broader human rights concerns in diamond mining.

Return to the full glossary for additional terms and definitions related to the Lobito Corridor.

Source Pack

This page is maintained against primary sources, institutional disclosures, and recognized standards rather than anonymous aggregation. The links below are the baseline references used for periodic verification of facts, terminology, risk framing, and corridor relevance.

Editorial use: figures and operational claims are treated as directional until supported by primary disclosure, public filings, official datasets, or a documented field record. Where source material conflicts, this site prioritizes official data, audited reporting, and independently verifiable standards.

Editorial Note

This glossary entry is designed as a concise research gateway, not as a closed encyclopedia article. Its editorial job is to define the subject, explain why it matters to the Lobito Corridor, and route readers toward deeper profiles, datasets, and primary sources. Updates are made when new public data, official disclosures, regulatory changes, or field monitoring materially alter the corridor assessment.

For institutional users, the page should be read as an index layer: it helps locate the relevant company, mine, community, regulation, commodity, or infrastructure file before moving into article-length analysis. Claims that affect investment, human-rights, ESG, or public-policy interpretation should be checked against the linked source pack and the underlying corridor database before being reused externally.

Where This Fits

This page belongs to the Lobito Corridor institutional research graph. Use the links below to verify route context, financing, mineral exposure, and strategic relevance before treating this page as a standalone source.

Analysis by Lobito Corridor Intelligence. Last updated May 19, 2026.