Mineral extraction using manual labour and simple tools, typically by individuals or small groups, without industrial equipment or formal employment contracts.

Corridor Context

ASM is a defining feature of the DRC's cobalt sector, providing livelihoods for an estimated 200,000+ workers in the copper-cobalt belt. Artisanal miners — known locally as creuseurs — work in often dangerous conditions, sometimes alongside industrial operations run by companies like Glencore and CMOC. The EGC was established to formalise artisanal cobalt purchasing, and the corridor's first artisanal cobalt shipment marked a milestone in supply chain formalisation.

ASM regulation is governed by the DRC Artisanal Mining Regulations and subject to international due diligence under the OECD Guidance and EU CSDDD.

Scale and Significance

In the DRC alone, an estimated two million artisanal miners and up to ten million dependents rely on ASM for their livelihoods. The sector produces a significant share of the DRC's cobalt output — estimates range from 15% to 30% of national production. ASM also produces copper, gold, tin, tantalum, and tungsten, making it one of the most significant economic activities in corridor-affected communities.

Corridor Implications

The corridor's development intersects with ASM in multiple ways. Infrastructure construction may displace mining sites. Formalisation through EGC restructures purchasing channels. Transport infrastructure changes logistics costs for ASM output. Whether these changes improve or worsen ASM livelihoods depends on policies and implementation that our monitoring tracks. Child labour, safety conditions, and environmental practices in ASM remain priority concerns for our human rights monitoring.

Monitoring and Accountability

This concept should be tested in practice against public project documents, legal requirements, company disclosures, regulator material, and credible community or civil-society reporting. Stated commitments should not be treated as implemented outcomes without source support.

Understanding this concept and its practical implications is useful for corridor stakeholders including investors, communities, regulators, journalists, and civil-society organisations. Users should follow the linked source material before relying on the term for investment, legal, or policy decisions.

Further Resources

Further analysis should connect this term to corridor operations, country-level context, and the relevant source documents. This page is a starting point, not a substitute for primary-source review.

← Full Glossary